Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000095 31

Image

File
Download upr000095-031.tif (image/tiff; 23.24 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000095-031
Details

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

Lob Angeles, February 11, 1953 80-11 Mr. H. L. Adamson: (cc - Mr. L. R. Mftag) I am starting to prepare final contract for sale of the water system at Las Vegas to the Las Vegas Valley Wa ter District. The contract of sale should have attached to it maps showing the facilities which will be sold to the District. I think the map marked Exhibit "A-l" at­tached to the proposed pipe line agreement with the Dis­trict Twill be sufficient to show the location of the Railroad facilities which will be sold as they existed on September 1, 1952. Perhaps the facilities being con­structed in connection with the new 300,000 gallon ele­vated tank should be Indicated In color on the map so such facilities can be referred to in the contract as facilities which were under construction but not com­pleted on September 1, 1952. Will you also please arrange to prepare and furnish map similar in size to Exhibit "A-l" showing the loca­tion of the distribution system of the LVL&W Company which was in existence on September 1, 1952. I do not think it will be necessary to show the sizes of the var­ious mains in separate colors, but you should show in one color the mains which were completed on September 1, 1952, and in another color the mains which were par­tially but not wholly completed on September 1, 1952. The map need not show any jobs which were Initiated sub­sequent to September 1, 1952. However I should like to discuss this feature with you because if there have been a number of capital additions commenced since September 1, 1952, it might be well to show them on the map to in­dicate to the District the additional work which they will have to pay for so far as it is known at the time the contract is drawn. E. E. Bennett