Information
Digital ID
upr000281-072
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.T Rr. R.R* Rems# Pag# 8 November 29, 1951 In view of the attitude of the Commission towards the Rater Company, Mr. Reinhardt and 1 felt It might be an appropriate time to revive our appliestion an d ! wrote the Comm 18*1 on asking that the matter he given further consideration and an ex parte order he Issued. Somewhat to ay surprise, the order w e leeued and X enclose a copy thereof* Frankly, I do not think the Commission will make the order permanent at the hearing on January 22, 195s and it is mite possible that we may be met with some injunction suits by potential subdividers or representatives of the Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce* However, Mr. Cory advisee that we have stirred up considerable disweeten and it Is very possible that we will get some results from thp water district or even the City of las Vegas itself looking towards purchase of the Water Company* cN ® S Bennett E n d s