upr000065 409

V ia connection with the appropriation of water at the of the drill Inc of the various wells he shows separately from ®*}£J «»pital expenditures aade under the ease work order. I think this is important so that we can demonstrate to the OMiesioB that lore* eapltel expenditures have been wade by the Railroad Company for water production facilities whieh were in no way related to the fuel11ties constructed at the tlae the various appropriations of watsr were nade. ___. Alls® contends that our filings with the State JUHtl&oor do not agree with the inf emetic* whieh we placed la the record ia I A 8 Docket 127 concerning the eapltel aoet of the Railroad Company faal11ties. Since returning frcat Careoa City, Mr. Rsawiek has reviewed sea* of tee affidavits of completion filed with tee State Engineer and finds that teay do not purport to shew tee exact cost of tee various wells, ihey state teat "at least” a stated sue has baaa scant. Mr. Reinhardt has instructed W. S. fckmam, Acting Manager, to ravlew thesa filings and 1 have asked hr. Cory to cooperate with hits in obtaining the necessary information• Mr. Careoa has undoubtedly told you teat Mr. daalred detailed information relating to tee operation sM aaiateaaaae expenses and tee Las Vegas offiae expenses shoes ia tee eetlaated nunnery of operations of tee hater Company for the year 1951 which you prepared at my request. 1 would appreciate receiving several copies of a detailed hreakdoea of such expenses. When wo have assert **ined tea fasts concern* iag the statements eonteined ia our filings with the State Inglaeer and are ia position to furnish Mr. Allen with the above lafenaction ecooeralog tea capital investment of the Railroad Company and the operating expenses of the Water Ccm- paay. 1 desire to have Mr. Remrisk and probably a re pro seats- tive of your office confer again with Mr* Allen in the hope of obtaining further relief for tee Water Company without Court litigation. £« 2. Bennett