Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000042 24

Image

File
Download upr000042-024.tif (image/tiff; 23.09 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000042-024
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    Carson City, Nevada Nevada State Journal March 15, 194? WATER METER BILL MSSED BY SiATORS ? — Water Conservation j Declared Coal By Sponsors CARSON CITY, March 14. (U.R) The senate passed E. Frandsen Loomis’ and C. D. Baker’s much- debated water meter bill today with only one senator, Ralph Lat- tin of Churchill county, opposing its passage. The measure provides that indi­viduals may make complaints to the state public service commis­sion about persons they believe to be wasting water. The commis­sion would then order a hearing, and under the bill would be em­powered to install a water meter if it was found that the wastage complaint was valid. Both Loomis, R., Washoe, and Baker, D., Clark', co-sponsors of ;the bill, took the senate floor to urge its passage, pointing out that because of population require­ments only Las Vegas, Reno and j Sparks would be affected. Loomis declared that Reno “has ! the largest per capita consump­tion of water of any city, town or municipality in the United States. He said that per capita con­sumption of water in Reno “ac­tually is about twice as heavy as i that of the next heaviest user i community.” The average Reno j resident, Loomis said, uses about j 800 gallops of water annually. Loomis said that because of j j Reno’s continuing growth that its stqrm drain and sewerage systems ! couldn’t be expanded “fast enough '? to keep up with the "water being | wasted every day in the city.” j “You can’t get cooperation by j pleas,” Loomis declared. “You 1 i have to have a law hanging over ! the heads of the people.” Baker emphasized that the bill “under no circumstance would j allow the indiscriminate ihstalla- j tion of water meters by the public i utilities,” “It protects us against the indi- vidual who uses ten times more water than he needs,” Baker con­tinued, - pointing out that only Las Vegas, Reno and Sparks | would come under its provisions. Lattin opposed the bill’s passage, [declaring he felt it was the first step towards a move -by the pub- ] lie. utility companies to install [water meters in all Nevada cities [and towns. The bill now goes to the as- fsembly where further debate is expected. ...' ------------