Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000065 471

Image

File
Download upr000065-471.tif (image/tiff; 26.25 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000065-471
Details

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

1 wm *2* At the tine the later acquisitions of XtM were made by the heilroad Co&paay I do not laUtii that Ha Railroad company was adequately protected against drainage by others under the than existing water laws. Also, X think tbs history of tbs transactloss shoes that tbs land was not aspaired pri* warily to protest other leads of tike Railroad Company tot was acquired for tbe purpose of the expansion of its mil-drilling progra® end . in blocks which were available on the market. Bader such circumstances the Gemnlsslon should not treat es- ex­cess land land which is not actually covered by improves* nts if it was reasonably oeeessary to esquire all of tbs iud at the Urn it was purchased, fcfr. Reinhardt * a file R~G7t>-A2 on the subject of Wbter Supply - Lae Vegas, Voluns 1, contains documents which show that la the susner of 1937 tbe advisability of buying the Lorenxi property lying north of He servo ir he, 1 end -ell go, 1 was raised by talter Bracken, He was eoneemed lest the City buy the property and develop its own water supply, Fhc property was held at e high prise and perhaps the threat of nanlelp&l ewaarahlp wee used as a bargaining point, at Mr, Xcffer*s re* quest, Hr. Ssinhar&t deployed lie Ison Tgrylcr to ns he a report upon the water resources of the Company and the possibility of protesting the Company against developnent of a separate supply by the City, Mr, Taylor*a report in substance stated that there were various sources frcm which the City could develop a water supply end that it was not possible for tbe company to fully protect itself ag&iast eoupetltlve drilling by the City, He did reeoanend, however, that the water Cosapeny add to Its holdings in the isaaediete neighborhood of its wells for tbs pur­pose of allowing for future expansion. - He rese&NBsnded the acquisition of tbs Cutting property |(4C acres lying immediately north of the Springs) and the Hlan&a property (80 acres lying southwest of well go. 2) at a favorable price* He thought the lorensi property m» also favorable but that the price was out of the question, as a result of this report, nr. faff era oa November 4, 1937 authorised the purchase w "Ihe'above mentioned propertyHliuaea property was pur* chased in November of that year for 41600.00 but apparently tat' were unable to obtain the Cutting property although the file does not contain such inforo&ticn on the latter, J Bus to growth of the City end difficulty of supplying it with water, Mr, Reinhardt ashed tieotty (E.G.) Greene to make a report upon the hater Company and the water resources at Las Vegas, Mr, Green* on Cctobsr 16, 1939 made a very comprehensive report in which, among other things, he reconaended the ianediate drill* lag of two additional wells, one upon tbe original acreage of the H&ilroad and one upon the Hlnnam property. He also rccocmended the purchase of the Cutting property end the Pike property consist* ing of the fiii of &eetlon 31* He recommended the purchase of this property for the purpose of additional well expansion as required.