upr000044 19

*r. william Reinhardt * §2 well Jio. Permit No. Affidavit Bv « *At least® 3 hvuki Co. 10408 X#Vh&w Co. that at 813,748.92 4 mm co. 108C8 its expense expend* 1 ed *. ' -»;;» 10,924.00 6 mm co. 10700 e. 4,889.74 6 unm co. 10707 a * 7,630.26 7 U$L8& Go. 10867 vmjm Co. that at 4,500.00 8 >»» mum Co. ^ 1C868 its expense and at expense of {jpm for use and benefit of hVLM Co. there has been expended • fr 5,000.00 9 LVL&W Co. 10869 * it 4i 800.00 10 ItfiMi Co. 10670 « m 10,000.00 11 LVh^f Co. 11849 * « ' ?/ V... , 16,277.00 It will be noted, three affidavits were filed in connection with Sell Ho. 1, one by the IMdimt Co. and too by the UfZMi Co. also that two affidavits were filed by LVLfto Co. in connection with Well Uo. 2, although in the case of well So. 2 Proof of Application of Water to Beneficial Use ms filed only tmder Permit Ho* 10127 ao it covered all eater produced by the well. The Affidavits of Completion of work filed by LVL&w Co. pursuant to Permit Roe. 10458, 10508, 10708, and 10707 state the expenditures were node at expense of applicant whereas all other affidavits filed by hVL&w Co. state ttie expend!twres w&p® *%&{§& at ex ense of applicant and at expense of either hM£Um Co. «r U5*HR Co. for uo® and benefit of applicant. All affidavits contain the statement that *at least** a named amount of money has been expended. -Some--of the amounts may be actual coat although