Information
Digital ID
upr000041-138
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.V Account vs. 0. 0. D. Laundry. Las Vegas, Nevada > Mr. H. I. Bettis, Vice Pres. & Auditor, Las Vegas Land & Water Go., Los Angeles, Cal. Bear Sir , *» Replying to your letter under date inquiring about the Mr. Braun who had charge Laundry here. I wish to state that this Mr. the one who was formerly in business with Mr, of April 14th, of the C.O.D. Braun is not Brunswig in the drug business. Also replying to your favor of April 15th on this subject. I had an interview with Judge Thomas, and he endorsed on the bottom'of ^our letter the following: nI have the keys to the building in which the laundry plant is located, and have a sale pending through me, and if sale goes., X will soe bill is settled, if any change or danger comes, I will let you know. ¥. R. Thoms.” I While the above my opinion an absolute »g is a good notation, it is not in oeneni to settle otir account; and I would suggest, as Judge Thoms lias just si a some agreement in writing from Brunswig’that this bill regardless of whether the sale goes .ted, that we h he will sett! through or no Tours truly, ave e 4* ‘j •