Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000275 166

Image

File
Download upr000275-166.tif (image/tiff; 26.72 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000275-166
Details

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

Z ' & f m Las Vegas - Jane 18, 1943 * 83-1-A Mr. 9. F. Ashbys With farther reference to ay 8-5 April 5th, I»S§ April 82nd regarding year A-228 March 27th, in which yea request that we keep you advised of the progress of our efforts to cancel Buie 9-0, under which the LVL&WCo has underwritten cost of water main extensions to Defense hous­ing projects in has Vegas. X attach newspaper clipping regarding the Public Hearing held by Public Service Commission in Las Vegas on this subject June 16th. We produced witnesses who testified that in their opinion the mats construction of houses for Defense workers mis being overdone, especially in view of the reduction of McNeil Construction foroet at B.m .X. Plant. Messrs. Bennett and Mdtamee, and no protectants appeared, although the City Planning Engineer was present representing the City of Las Vegas. took the case under advisement pending receipt of transcript, and will render a decision in the near future, at which time X will adviee you further. The ease for the water Company was presented by At the conclusion of the hearing the Commission fflfll T ' l S S f f l co - Mr. 1. S. Bennett Mr. Leo A. MoN&mee Mr. Frank Strong <9 v M ¥*'1 4 }