Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

man000204 78

Image

File
Download man000204-078.tif (image/tiff; 26.59 MB)

Information

Digital ID

man000204-078
Details

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

144 WATER BILL C O L L E C T IO N S T A T IO N S The Board considered the following memorandum from Renshaw dated A p ril 2 9 , 1959 relative to water bill collection stations. T O : Board of Directors FR O M : W . C . Renshaw SU BJECT: Collection Stations for Water Bills The question of setting up collection stations for water bills at locations other them the District office has been .mentioned from time to time, but never discussed seriously by the Board. The last occasion was on November 5, 1958, when the matter was on the agenda because of an oral offer from Market Town on Sobth Fifth Street. However, it was decided to defer consideration until after the new Board had taken office on January 5, 1959, since future policy was involved. Essentially, it is a question of public relations, the principal effect being greater convenience for certain customers in paying their bills, although there may also be some slight beneficial effect on collections. Offsetting factors are increased cost of collection and accounting and certain problems which w ill arise in connection with delinquent accounts. The principal additional costs will, result from,the.fees charged by the various agencies making collections, salary and transportation for a man to pick up the collections from the stations, and the accounting work necessary to record and reconcile remittances. It is not believed that there would be any appreciable offsetting saving in collection expense at the main office,, since the present two cashiers are necessary for reasons . other than the volume of collections and would probably still be required In any case for rush periods. Although it may be possible to start with, only one or two stations, it appears reasonable to assume that pressure from the residents of other areas, as w ell as from business houses wanting to make collections, w ill make it necessary to increase the number within a short time up to possibly ten or eleven. Assuming ten or eleven stations and 50 per cent of residential customers using them, the annual cost is estimated as follows: Collection fees at 5$ per bill $ 2 ,7 0 0 .0 0 Collection pick up 2 ,8 0 0 .0 0 ; Accounting 450.00 Total $ 5,95 0 .0 0 per year The principal problems which can be anticipated in connection with delinquent accounts w ill arise from the delay between payment at the collection station and recording in the customer's account at the District office. There w ould, of course, be no trouble when.a delinquent b ill is paid within the time allowed on the shut off noticel since the shut off would be held up until collections