Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000105 320

Image

File
Download upr000105-320.tif (image/tiff; 26.75 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000105-320
Details

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

Mr, Edward C. Renwlck -5 November'23* 1951 The $1,400,000 is viewed as the capital structure that might be suitable for the issue of securities, Securities to be issued probably should be limited en­tirely to bonds and common stock, There would be no justi­fication for a preferred stock issue on a company as small as this one. Hie bonds should not exceed 50$ and in this case prob­ably a 40 or 45$ issue would be better. Under all the conditions obtaining it would appear to me that the bonds should carry a 4$ coupon rate and issued at par. Earnings on the common stock equity will necessarily de­pend on what is left after paying bond interest (and all other operating expenses). A minimum dividend rate of 8% would prob­ably be required to be attractive to outside purchasers. In­itially something less would probably be paid to the Union Pacific, fee following simple financial structure calling for earning requirements are as follows; Bonds 45$ $ 630,000 % 4$ $25,200 Stock 55$ 770.000 © 8$ 61,600 $1 ,400,000 6.2 186,800 If 7$ is paid instead of 8$, then 5.6$ would be earned and if only 6$ is paid, but 5*1$ would be earned over all. In our Exhibit nSff under integrated operations, a 6f$ return called for net revenue of $86,837 on an investment base of $1,389,400# If net additions to plant were equal to or exceeded the growth in the depreciation reserve, there would be no lessen­ing in the net plant value underlying the bonds. To the ex­tent that earnings exceeded dividends paid, the net worth would increase and the earnings in dollars on the common stock equity would increase from year to year. On any reorganisation in the capital structure and the bringing in of the Production Company, the accounting practice would undoubtedly be changed to ^retirement accounting15,. This would mean that upon replacement of a 4~inch main that stood on the books at, say, #1.50 per foot, the new 4-inch main would be capitalized at its present day cost of, say, #3.00 per foot. Under present IGC railroad requirements the #1.50 per foot in­crease is an expense charge. Similarly under group deprecia­tion practices, the whole original cost is charged to the res-