upr000350 119

V h, > ov p y«Vr K Kay 16, 1956 Kr. Thomas A. Campbell, President Las Vegas Valley Water District f, 0. Box 1109 Laa Vegas, Wevada Dear Kr. Campbell* Referring to agreement between the Railroads and the Water District dated June 1, 1953* It Is provided in that agreement that the Hall-road would, essong other things, grant an easement to the Water District between points A and "V* on Exhibit "a " attached to the agreement. The easement was so granted and, I presume, has been recorded. I now understand that the pipe line for which that easement waa granted waa built to the west of the easement strip on property of the Water District, and, therefore, there would seem to be no reason why the District should continue to held that particular ease­ment. If I u correct In this assumption, I would appreciate If you would take up with the Board of Director* the question of having the District quitela1* that easement beck to the Lot Angeles A Salt lake Railroad Ceapany. Although the general easement provides that if the grantee shall cease to uae any of the easement strip#, they shall revert to the grantors, nevertheless, sines ths easements have been recorded, I think a quitelai* deed, which could be recorded, would clear up the title to this particular strip of land. You nay recall we had a similar situation In connection with the site for the proposed relocated pump­ing station, and the District gave the Los Angeles A Salt tSJft 1 6 1956 u m G# i.