Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
Mr. W* R. Rouse 3. April 2, 1952 they therefore cannot he deemed to be conclusive with respect to the two questions above mentioned which are presented by Section 23(q}(l), For that reason and for the reason that there is some lack of uniformity in the various decisions having a bearing upon these questions it is impossible for me to answer these questions categorically. However I have examined a large number of decisions of our Federal Courts and of the courts of the various states and have reached the conclusion that our Federal Courts would probably hold: (1) That the Las ¥egas Water District is a political subdivision of the State of llevada and (2) Ithe transfer of the water production and distribution facilities of the Railroad and the Water Company to that District would be for exclusively public purposes. In spite of these conclusions I believe that it would be unwise for the Company to act on the opinion of counsel without attempting to protect itself against unfavorable tax consequences by obtaining a prior commitment from the Commissioner of Internal Revenue as to the right to deduct from gross income the market value of the property prior to the transfer thereof to the District. One course of action would he to obtain a ruling from the Commissioner which might be adhered to. However I call your attention to the fact that a ruling by the Commissioner does not necessarily preclude the Commissioner from taking a later inconsistent position and assessing a deficiency against the taxpayer. Knapp-Monarch Co. v. Commissioner, 139 Fed. 2d 863. As pointed out in this case, the only certain way to protect a- gainst possible tax liability is to obtain a binding closing agreement with the Government under Section 3760 of the Internal Revenue Code. ? I realize that such closing agreements are frequently difficult to obtain and take considerable time. However it is my understanding that in appropriate cases closing agreements are entered into with re-