Image
Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
O > TA BLE O F CASES.1 PACK Ashland Water Company v. Railroad Commission, 7 Fed. (2d), 924, 927 ______;___________________________________ ...______32 Beaumont S. L. & W. R. Co. v. United States (Nov. 24, 1930), 75 L. Ed. (Adv. Opns.) 41, 47--------------------------------------------- 35 Ben Avon Borough v. Ohio Valley Water Company, 114 Atl. 369.. 94 Bluefield W. W. & I. Co. v. Public Service Commission, 262 U. S. 679, 689, 690.___________________________________10, 26, 28, 136 Board of Public Utility Commissioners v. New York Tel. Co., 271 U. S. 23____________________________________________ 60, 77, 87 Brooklyn Borough Gas Company v. Prendergast, 16 Fed. (2d) 615 ____________________________________________________ 52, 93 Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. Nixon, 2 Fed. (2d) 118.----------------- 160 Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. Prendergast, 7 Fed. (2d) 628, at 672....139 Chesapeake & Potomac Tel. Co. v. Whitman, 3 Fed. (2d) 938.-----181 Chicago M. & St. P. R. R. Co. v. Public Utility Commission of Idaho, 274 U. S. 344-------------------- ------------- ...---------------------- 48 Consolidated Gas Co. of New York v. Prendergast, 6 Fed. (2d) 243, 280 ..._____________________ ______ ______30, 52, 61, 78, 139 Denny v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Company, 276 U. S. 97.... 32 Depreciation Charges of Telephone and Steam Railroad Companies, 118 I. C. C 295---------------------------------- -— -------------------------168 City of Fort Smith v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., 270 U. S. 627— 87 Re Great Western Power Co. Valuation, 34 C. R. C. 205, 207........114 Idaho Power Co. v. Thompson, 19 Fed. (2d) 547--- ---------------- •— 93 Indiana Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission, 300 Fed. 1 9 0 __ _________________________ _— --------------------------- 181 Joplin Gas Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm., 296 Fed. 271, at 280.--- ------- 139 Kings County Lighting Company v. Prendergast, 7 Fed. (2d) 1 9 2 ____________________ - - . I ___________ l ---------------52, 139, 146 Landon v. Ct. Ind. Rel., 269 Fed. 433, at 445..—...............................138 1. Excepting those in Appendix “A" on “Going Value.” f