Information
Digital ID
upr000278-191
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.V 4 9 Capital Base& Amount Pe^££>at Investment $ 63,6711 29»7V$J Original Cost if 88,227 58.42# Present-hay Cost 4142,980 66 It is of Interest to observe that if the production oompany -H 'J be treated as an integrated part of the Water utility and a return earned on the combined properties, the results are identical with those heretofore presented, wherein the production @5£#5ps is treated as a separate enterprise wholesaling water to the Las Vegas Land and Water Company. Suoh uniform treatment oarries with it the necessity of utilising comparable capital bases and tax rates. This latter compilation is set forth in Table P*