Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000158 93

Image

File
Download upr000158-093.tif (image/tiff; 26.72 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000158-093
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    cc Mr. A. S. Halsted Los Angeles, February 19, 1929. 085-355 Mr* F. H. Melfamee: With Mr. Balated’s letter to rae May 18, 1927, he submitted a proposed agreement between L A & S L B B O o . and lias Tegas Land and Water Company co Ye ring arrangement where­by the latter corapary secures water at Las Yogas, leva&a, which agreement had been prepared by you. The two originals and sis copies of the document which he sent me are returned to you herewith: the enclosed draft of agreement was prepared, it was decided to hold in abeyance the making of a new contract until we coaid obtain meter readings showing the water consumed by each company, on which to base division of cost. We now have such readings for the year 1928, and find that on basis of use of facilities serving""'the' two companies, the charge against the 1. Y. I* and W. Co. should be approximately §975yOQ war month. instead of $500.00, as called for in afiaohea draft of agree-"" raent. I suggest, therefore, that the enclosed document be revised accordingly. I think we shooId at the same time make provision in this agreement for revision each year of monthly charge on basis of previous year’s consumption, and also include a provision that the Land and Water Company shall bear its proportion of increased cost of water due to improve­ment in the facilities* enclosed document revised accordingly, and then return the papers to me for further handling. agreement extending, to October 1, 1928, the old agreement between the Bailroad Company and the Land and Water Company (contract audit Bo. 2850-A), covering sale of water and elec­tricity by the former to the latter. The extension agreement was duly executed, which, therefore, covered the arrangement to October 1, 1928. Pending farther development respecting the electrical situation, I think the old agreement should be extended for another year, i.e.» to October 1, 1929, insofar as furnishing of electricity is concerned. As I question the advisability of making the new water agreement retroactive, I As I advised you in my letter June 10, 1927, after I shall appreciate it if you will kindly have the In this connection you sent me October 12, 1927 an