Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

man000204 148

Image

File
Download man000204-148.tif (image/tiff; 26.42 MB)

Information

Digital ID

man000204-148
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    2 9 BTT.T.TNG UNDER METERED RATES Manager Renshaw requested authority to bill the follow-r— ing under metered rates: Fremont Hotel Private line serving several customers on Pinto Lane west of Shadow Greater Las Vegas No. 2 Highland Square A motion was duly made by Director Cornwall, seconded by Director Rosevear, and unanimously approved by the five Directors present, that the Manager be authorized to commence billing under metered rates as requested. LAS VEGAS LAND AND WATER COMPANY - REQUEST FOR QUITCLAIM OF EASEMENT The following letter from William Reinhardt relative to quitclaim of easement was considered by the Board. "Mr. Thomas A. Campbell, President May 16, 1956 Las Vegas Valley Water District P. 0. Box 1109 Las Vegas, Nevada Dear Mr. Campbell: Referring to agreement between the Railroads and the Water District dated June 1, 1953: It is provided in that agreement that the Railroad would, among other things, grant an easement to the Water District between points "A" and "V" as shown on Exhibit MA" attached to the agreement. The easement was so granted and, I presume, has been recorded. I now understand that the pipe line for which that easement was granted was built to the west of the easement strip on property of the Water District, and, therefore, there would seem to be no reason why the District should continue to hold that particular easement. If I am correct in this assumption, I would appreciate if you would take up with the Board of Directors the question of having the District quitclaim that easement back to the Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad Company. Alttumgh the general easement provides that if the grantee shall cease to use any o y strips, they shall revert to the grantors, nevertheless, since the easements have been recorded, I think a quitclaim deed, which could be recorded, would clear up the title to this particular strip of land. You may recall we had a similar situation in connection with the site for the proposed relocated pumping station, and the District gave the Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad Company a Grant, Bargain and Sale Deed for that particular parcel of land since the District had decided it would not be necessary for a pumping station. Very truly yours, /s/ Vital. Reinhardt" A motion was duly made by Director Cornwall, seconded by Director Miller, and unanimously approved by the five Directors present, that the request for ease­ment be approved, subject to preparation of the necessary papers by the Las Vegas Land and Water Company