Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000149 284

Image

File
Download upr000149-284.tif (image/tiff; 31.11 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000149-284
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    BARCUS, KINDRED & CO. Telefjooe Randolph 1400 MUNICIPAL BONDS 231 S. LA SALLE ST. CHICAGO Teletype CGO 240 A Study of WATERWORKS CHARGES In 286 Cities * * * * A noticeable trend in municipal financing has been the increase in bonds payable solely out of revenue derived from users of the ser­vices furnished. It is important for buyers of such revenue bonds, as well as for municipal officials and the users affected, to know what charges are customary for established utilities and how many users may be expected. Where the plant is a new one, these points take on a particular im­portance. If either the rates to be charged or the number of users required must exceed established standards in order to pay revenue bonds, the economic feasibility of the project may be questioned. Even though careful study shows that the proposed improvement has a special value in the municipality under consideration, the fact that rates must exceed a normal average should be known and taken into account. It is frequently true, however, that new plants, especially where there is an urgent need for the service to be furnished, call for rates which approach the higher limits of those in any representa­tive group of municipal plants. As specialists in municipal financing, we are prepared to compare new projects with available standards on established plants, and to indicate whether such financing is sound, in the light of results obtained by other municipalities. In view of the large number of water revenue bonds of new plants is­sued in recent years, where the financing is predicated on estimated earnings and anticipated number of users, we believe that the follow ing tabulation of rates and number of users in 286 waterworks plants is of interest. This tabulation, divided into cities of four population groups, fol­lows immediately. Quarterly and yearly rates have been computed on^ a monthly basis and rates charged in cubic feet have been translated into gallons to facilitate comparison between cities. The cost to a user in each city is shown (a) if he pays only the min iraum rate per month, and (b) if he uses amounts of water which are normal for ordinary domestic consumption, namely, 3,000 to 5,000 gal Ions per month. These computations have been made from rate schedules published in the American City Magazine. Particular attention is called to notes and comments following the tabulated data. * * * * 12/22/41 Rev