Information
Digital ID
upr000212-080
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Los Ang e l a s - M a y 3rd, 1940 .Mra, W. R. Bracken: I have your letter of M a y 2nd, file W 23-5-3, In w h i c h y o u suggest that w e e x t e n d the pipe line f r o m W e l l No. 4 to an Intake b o x to be c o n s t ructed alongside the settling b a s i n r a t h e r than turn the flow into the 12* line f r o m W e l l No. 2. . S S i p l i ® 8 S | | | S | Immediately u p o n co m p l e t i o n of Well No. 4 we propose to r e c o n d i t i o n Well No. 2, and in so d o i n g will h a v e valve control of the f l o w f r o m that w e l l the same as w e will have f r o m W e l l No. 4. W i t h this arrangement it obvio u s l y will n o t be n e c e s s a r y to s h u t d o w n the two wells in o r d e r to p e r f o r m any w o r k u p o n o n e of them. As we w i l l effect a n appreciable saving b y connec t i n g into the 1 2 ” line I do n o t think w e can justify the additional expense y o u suggest. F r a n k S t r o n g CC - Mr. Win. R e i n h a r d t