UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
Digital Provenance
Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
Publisher
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries
Transcription
tations in this Schedule III show that under the rates prescribed by the Commission, the Water Company during the test year of 1951 will still continue to suffer a deficiencjr in earnings of $3S}7$9.00 solely because of the failure of the Commission to include in the Railroad Company rate base fixed by the Commission the capital cost of water production facilities actually recorded on the books as of December 31, 1950, and the estimated cost of additions wrhich will be made during the year 1951. The foregoing figures show that the error made by the Commission in computing the joint facility rent allowance, contribute substantially to the overall deficiency in revenues which will exist under the prescribed rates. We shall see when we consider the errors made by the Commission in its computation dealing with the Water Company alone, that such errors also contribute substantially to the overall deficiency in revenues under the prescribed rates. -54-
