UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
Digital Provenance
Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
Publisher
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries
Transcription
Assessment - West Riverside Canal. Los Angeles, Cal. March 14, 1917. Mr. A. S. Halsted, General Counsel, Dear Sir: I hand you a file ending with letter dated March 13th, from Mr. Cullen, regarding a bill from the West Riverside Canal Committee, for a proportion of expenses for the year 1916. You will note that Mr. Cullen suggests a revision of our contract No. 471, covering water v/hich we secure from the canal. If future assessments amount.-asag; to less than the payments provided for in the contract,it would, of course, be to our advantage to have same amended as he suggests, but if this id done it seems to me that it should carry a provision that in no basesthe assessment be in excess of such amount. I should be glad to have your opinion. Yours truly,
