Image
Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
V the pipe line from HH to R, then there will not be new pipe lines to construct at this time as it is our intention that existing pipe line HH to R will be left in place to be used as future extension to serve our property in the general vicinity of Section 35. It may have reference to all the pipe lines described above. However, I do not see that we have any real reason to question the wording in this particular paragraph, as if included in the contract, it cannot do us any harm. 4 - Page 3, Section 3. Is it the intention to sell this isolated parcel of land with reversionary clause to accommodate the pumping station in its new location, or will we give them a lease for the 5000-sq. ft. area? I do not know whether this question has been discussed with representatives of the Water District. 5 - Page 3, Section 4 ^ I would like to discuss this section with you. Will we grant them an easement or what for area (5000 sq. ft.) required for the relocated pumping station? 6 - Page 4, Section 7, line 4. After the words ttthe 16tt transite” insert nand cast iron”. 7 - Page 5, Section 9. Last paragraph, Items a, b and c, on page 6 , in connection with width of easement for pipe line and power line. I do not see why Water District needs an easement 20 ft. wide for pipe line. It is my opinion that in all places In the agreement where easement widths are mentioned we should confine the width to 10 ft. for power lines and 10 ft. for pipe lines, with the exception of easement for Line H to J and pipe line LO and HP which should be limited to 6-ft. width, due to fact these pipe lines are near operated railroad tracks, or are near other facilities. Page 6 , Paragraph (c), Section 9. I note the District is asking for 20-ft. wide easement for power line between points CC and DD and points EE to GG, shown on exhibit print 1-128, and have not asked for easement across U. S. Highway Ho. 95. This was probably on basis that Water District expects to obtain easement across the highway from City of Las Vegas, to whom Railroad