Information
Digital ID
upr000351-054
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Los Angeles, December 2D, 195^ File: 569 Vol. #3 Mr. V. W. Smith - Los Angeles: Reference your letter December 7th, File W.O. 5704: This property was conveyed to OP HR by LA4SLRRC0 per Deed Audit 535V, fee for recording this deed was $2.80 and since the consideration was less than $100*00 no revenue stamps were required. The same property was thereafter conveyed by DPRRC0 to Las Vegas Valley Kater District per OP L.S. Deed 2311} revenue stamps in amount 55# were place on said deed and the recording of said deed was paid for by the Las Vegas Valley lit ter District. Therefore, the charges should be - Revenue stamps 55#, Recording fee $2.80. Insofar as this Department is concerned), this transaction may be considered conpleted as of the date of issue of the authority, i.e. November 24, 1954. C. M. BATES CWB/ela