upr000279 61

Mr. l. Banwiofct Wfy? c, i#§ f««a* - dpTlX V/jgj toft Afl? 20 7*5j I oo - IB*. Ho* Reinhardt fir. Hoy A. Wehe M U S ® h©8 Faelfle Mutual Hifc San Franoiioo, California Referring to your letter of April 13, file 80-3, to Mr. wehe, and confirming conversation dot#, oonoernlng revised estimated revenue# under oar proposal revised rate schedule* Hr, Wehe and 2 had previously discussed tho possi­b ility of consolidating tho apartment and bungalow courts classifications, or at least applying tho asm© rate to these classes. « it water consumption for theae classes being com­parable and considerable loaa than that far homee with aorrnal aprinklered ^area*, m w ft of the opinio tho rato should bo at leaat Ji# per unit below tho housa rato. Following your phone sail Tuesday afternoon, 1 again discussed the natter with Mr. wehe in a general way, and no a result I suggest the following change# in thie< olaaa rates using aa a baae for ccapar&tive purpose* a 5 roon house with toilet and bath on a normal 7600 at* f t . lo t - yrt.. m Homs ii.f§ 13.80 or #3.99 Apartment With Bath d Toilet 2.73 2.20 or 3.30 Without lath d Toilet 2.10 1.73 o f 1.85 Bungalow Court « * lath d Toilet 2.73 2.20 or 2.30 Without Bath d Toilet 2.10 1.75 er 1.85 The inoreaet in the house rate would Increase the rate under the proposed amended motel rate for the first unit from $2.70 to p « b or |2.90» in addition to ths above the rate for additional sprlnfclered area should be increased from Z f to m *