upr000331 68

FORM 10- 59*10- 10- 12M I I I S A N P E D R O , L O S A N G E L E S A N D S A L T L A K E R A I L R O A D C O M P A N Y General Counsel. Dear S ir :- Referring to your le tte r o f September 11,1912, in regard to the manner of handling dockage charges at East San Pedro under the provisions of the lo s Angeles City Ordinance: to arrange an agreed method of dividng the dockage between the d i f ­ferent wharf owners where a vessel docks at more than one wharf on the same day. He has requested the Banning Company to furnish a statement showing the landings made by their vessels since the Ordi­nance went into effect in order that he can render b i l l against the Southern P acific Company as suggested by you. dent Cullen dated June 2nd, also le tte r from the agent at East San Pedro addressed to him on the same date. landings per day at the S.P.Co. wharf, two per day at our wharf and one per day at their own wharf. Kindly let me have your opinion as to the proper division of thewharfagecharges under the terms of ’ V A C C O U N T IN G D E P A R TM E N T H. I. Collection of dockage, East San Pedro. Los Angeles, JUN 1 4 1913 Mr. A. S. Halsted, The Superintendent has not as yet apparently been able In this connection I am enclosing le tte r from Superinten­The agent advises that the Banning Company boats make two Yours Auditor.