Image
Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
* ceeded the estimates of such costs which were offered in evidence by the Water Company at the former hearings in the above entitled case and the estimates of such costs used by the Commission in its said Opinion of August 24, 1951. As a result the amounts found by the Commission in its Opinion and Order of August 24, 1951, to be the cost of maintaining and operating the water production facilities of the Railroad Company and the water distribution facilities of the Water Company during the year 1951 were substantially less than the actual costs incurred by said companies during the calendar year 1951. Accordingly the rates prescribed by the Commission in its Orders of August 24, 1951, and Uecember 7, 1951, make an insufficient allowance for the operating and maintenance expenses incurred by the Railroad Company and the Water Company during the year 1951 and Ttfhich will be incurred during the year 1952. If a rehearing is granted in this case, your petitioner will offer evidence concerning the actual increase in such costs incurred in the calendar year 1951 and the a-mount of such costs which is to be expected in the calendar year 1952. IV On October 20, 1951, after the close of the former hearings in the above entitled case the Congress of the United States enacted the 1951 Revenue Act, which, effective as of April 1, 1951, increased the tax rate on normal net income of corporations from 25% to 27$ and the rate on surtax net in- 5