UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
Digital Provenance
Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
Publisher
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries
Transcription
(C 0 P Y) % (TRANSLATION) 1947 JAN 50 PM 5 16 82Z ' RENO JAN 30 NFT ? s - , E E BENNETT UP LA YOUR LETTER 21 ENCLOSING FOLGER'S R-49-16TH LAS VEGAS, NEVADA, MAN AGREEABLE INTRODUCING BILL BUT BELIEVES WOULD CARRY MORE STRENGTH IP JOINT INTRODUCTION BY HIM AND RENO, NEVADA, COLLEAGUE. LATTER, HOWEVER, NOT AGREEABLE OUTRIGHT REPEAL..PREFERS RESTRICTION ONLY SO PAR.AS TO PERMIT COMPLAINTS TO BE MADE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION SO LATTER MAY MAKE INSTALLATION METER IN THOSE CASES WHERE SHOWN THERE HAS NOT BEEN REASONABLE AND BENEFICIAL USE MADE OP WATER SUPPLIED INDIVIDUAL USERS COMPLAINED AGAINST OTHERS WILL IMPORTUNE RENO MAN FOR OUTRIGHT REPEAL BUT WOULD COMPROMISE SUGGESTED BE AGREEABLE TO YOU IP HE REMAINS ADAMANT? A-30 R E MARKS
