Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
p i§ I m I P Mr. W. H. Johnson Mr. Calvin M. Cory) t December 4, 1951 Fils 4705-11-22 Mr. Robert A. Allen, Chairman Public Service Commission N m . R. State of Nevada PEC (5 “.951 Carson City, Nevada Dear Mr. Allen: Re: Las Vegas Land and Water Company, I & S Docket No. 1 2 7 _________ This will refer to our recent telephone conversation concerning the rates on motels with respeot to which I wrote Mr. Lee S. Scott on November 27, 1951. In our telephone conversation you suggested that the Las Vegas Land and Water Company give consideration to voluntarily placing in effect the motel rates which were proposed by the Las Vegas Land and Water Company in Exhibit "W" in I & S Docket 127 for application to motels as distinguished from bungalow oourts. As stated in my letter to Mr. Scott, the rates which were set forth in Exhibit MWM were only a part of the proposal of the Water Company. Our proposal of those rates was related to our other rate proposals contained in Exhibit f,VM. If the rates which we proposed in Exhibit "V" and in Exhibit "W" had been allowed to go into effect, the Water Company would have increased its revenues by approximately #90,813 a year, using 1951 as the test year. The rates prescribed by the Commission in its order of August 2 4 , 1951, allowed an increase of only approximately #25,000 a year. Under the allowed increase the Water Company is earning no return at all and is suffering a defioit. If we were to place in effect the rates shown in Exhibit f’Wfl the revenues of the Water Company would be further decreased because they would return less revenue than the rates for motels prescribed by the Commission in its order of August 24, 1951. We can see no Justification for any voluntary action on our part which would result in a decrease in our revenues in view of the fact that our revenues under the Commission- prescribed rates are entirely Inadequate. Furthermore we think it would be Improper for the Commission to or- DEC 5 1951 C* C,