upr000194 142

* Les Vegas - May 18, 195^ V 9-1-3 * % Mr. L. V, Peart - Omaha In reviewing the MOH accounts at this office for the period subsequent to the annual inventory of materials and supplies on hand at Las Vegas as of June 30# 1953# the follow­ing discrepancies developed? 1. Form 5064 dated September 18# 1953# covering payment of Freight Bill No. 326990 by Draft No. 1016 - As shown Charge MOH $2.06 Should be Charge Acct. 30-2 2.06 2. Form 5064 dated September 18# 1953# freight charges Freight Bill No. 10318, paid by Draft No. As1 01s5h o-wn Charge Acct* 30-2 |4«43 Should be Charge MOH 4.43 3. Fora 5064 dated September 28# 1953# covering freight chargee Freight Bill No. 12250# paid by ADsr afsth owNon. 104C3h a-rge MOH #2.00 Should be Charge Acct. 30-2 2.00 4. JanuAas rys,h o1w9n5 ^# CMhOarHg eR eApocrctt .-30-2 $4135.88 As pecrha ryoguerd TbyS -y6 our office 4134.88 Will you kindly arrange to make the above adjustments in your accounts advising. Please refer to Sheet No. 2 of Annual Inventory of materials and supplies at Las Vegas as of April 30, 1954, Please note the Item - 1 Second Hand 6” Cast Iron Tee @ 110.00. This Item was previously charged out and returned to stock. In view of this will you kindly arrange to charge account MOH and credit Account 30-2. This refers to my letter of May 6, 1954# relative to Sale Order SW-44-V, covering sale of 55® LF of 8“ oast iron pipe. The 88 pipe Involved was carried in our MOH Account at the price of 12.41236 per foot, although it was sold at $2.42 a foot. In view of this will you kindly correct distribution to read “Credit MOH $1346.10 and Miscellaneous Revenue $139.30.” It appears that the sale of the Company will take place within the next few months. In view of this, and to avoid any further discrepancies between your accounts and ours, may I sug­gest that when a discrepancy is discovered that we be Immediately notified so that all records can be adjusted accordingly. Your comments on this would be appreciated. MED?ejp L. H. Maag