Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000061 215

Image

File
Download upr000061-215.tif (image/tiff; 24.54 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000061-215
Details

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

W&;{ WATER RATES | las Ye gas 'x ?'Desert;,B'tirL 9-4-51 The Daily Desert Sun brought real news to the people of Las Vegas yesterday morn­ing with the first and only complete release ; of the report and conclusions of the Nevada ; Public Service Commission on Las Vegas water rates. It is refreshing to read the complete tabulation, when done so with the j thought that it is truly a document based upon equity; fair and impartial to consumer and producer alike. Some apprehension Was manifest, when ’.! the Las Vegas Land and Water Company made its application for increased rates last j March. The Chamber of Commerce ad- I vanced to a position of aggression and then retreated; some public-spirited individuals 1 voiced their disapproval, ‘ while Mr. and Mrs. Average Citizen wondered. And now ! that the commission has made its decision ! the Las Vegas water question is again rele- j gated to the status of “finished business.” ( The Daily Desert Sun believes it voices 1 the expression of the entire community when it extends an appreciation to the four members of the Public Service Commission, J. F. Shaughnessy, George W. Malone, H. H. i Martin and Lee S. Scott. Suchi decisions as theirs tend to rehabili­tate a confidence in public officials that has j been greatly stifled during the past few years* ? ? ; -