Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000160 106

Image

File
Download upr000160-106.tif (image/tiff; 23.52 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000160-106
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    Ife W* H. Douse 2* January 10, 1952 in te rim p la n to be adopted u n t i l th e p ro p e rty could be d isp o se d o f to. th e D i s t r i c t • The .plan su g g e ste d was - a ls o in te n d e d a s -a p r o te c tio n t o th e R a ilro a d Company in th e ev en t th e D i s t r i c t should u ltim a te ly be u nable t o a c ­q u ire the- w ate r system* The Las ¥egss V a lle y lis te r D i s t r i c t was formed in ' 194$ and. s in c e t h a t tim e has n o t been a b le t o o b ta in th e f in a n c in g to a c q u ire a w a te r system and t o b rin g in a su p p lem en tary su p p ly o f w a te r from ta k e Mead. A lthough i t s n e g o tia tio n s f o r a su p p lem en tary su p p ly now look b e t ­t e r th e n a t any t i m e ’in 'th e p a s t, th e r e i s no c e r t a i n t y t h a t th e D i s t r i c t w ill b# a b le t o fu n c tio n * I t was w ith t h i s in* mind t h a t 1 su g g e ste d f o r c o n s id e r a tio n th e tr a n s ­f e r o f th e w ater p ro d u c tio n f a c i l i t i e s from th e ? ? 1Iro a d - t o th e W ater Company so th a t th e H ailhoad Company would be e n t i r e l y d iv o rced from th e Weber b u sin e ss^ a n d could n o t be exposed t o a demand’ t h a t I t fin a n c e th e b rin g in g in o f ta k e Mead w eter in th e e v e n t th e ' D is tr ic t^ plan- f i ­n a l l y blew up* v When t made th e su g g e stio n ., 1 bad n o t co n tem p lated th e p o s s i b i l i t y t h a t o u r management m ight be w illin g to d o n ate th e w ate r system to th e D is tr ic t'* • 1 had assumed t h a t i t was our in te n tio n .to -s e ll th e system to th e D is­t r i c t e t s o m f a i r price*. I f th e management f i n a l l y de­c id e s to d is p o s e o f th e w ater svsto® by a s a le th e r e o f to th e D i s t r i c t r a t h e r th a n by a d o n a tio n , X. b e lie v e th e p la n .su g g e sted in sty . l e t t e r sh ould be g iv e n e a r ly -consid­e r a tio n * However if . th e .management f in d s i t ’mors advantageous t o donate th e system th a n to s e l l i t , 1 0 m r e a d ily see th e re a so n why fcha ‘le ilr o s d sh o u ld not t r a n s f e r i t s w ater-j. re d u c tio n f a c i l i t i e s to th e V eter Company* I m n o t com­m enting upon' D r. H u ls is e r , e su g g e stio n r o ^ r d i n g th e i d - v an tag e ox d o n a tio n .'because I be H a v e t h a t i s p u re ly a ta x q u e s tio n a s w ell ft# a p o lic y q u e s tio n , w ith re s p e c t to which X cannot be very h e lp fu l* I f i t i s d ecid ed to donate r a t h e r th a n t o s e l l th e sy stem , I have a few e u g re e tio n a w ith r e s p e c t t o th e me­c h a n ic s of c a rry in g o u t th e don atio n * X do n o t u n d e r-