Las Vegas City Ordinances, March 31, 1933 to October 25, 1950, lvc000014-516

ordinance, the roll was called with the following result: Those voting "Aye": Commissioner Bunker Commissioner___Moore , Commissioner Peccole Commissioner Whipple_____________, and Mayor Cragin . Absent: None________________. Those voting "Nay": None_________________. The presiding officer thereupon declared that four Commissioners having voted in favor thereof, said motion was carried and said ordinance was duly passed and adopted as an emergency ordinance. On motion duly adopted, it was ordered that said emergency ordinance be numbered 435, and after approval by the Mayor shall be published as in said ordinance designated, and shall be recorded according to law. There being no further business to come before the Board of Commissioners, the meeting was, on motion duly made, seconded and carried, adjourned. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Emergency Ordinance No. 435 copied into City of Las Vegas Commissioners' Minute Book No. 7 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF NEVADA,) COUNTY OF CLARK )ss. ______Carl Woodbury________________, being first duly sworn, deposes, and says: That he is Auditor of the LAS VEGAS EVENING REVIEW-JOURNAL, a daily newspaper, of general circulation, printed and published at Las Vegas, in the County of Clark, State of Nevada , and that the. attached was continuously published in said newspaper for a period of 2 insertions from October 29, 1950 to November 5, 1950 inclusive, being the issues of said newspaper for the following dates, to-wit: October 29 and November 5, 1950. That said news- paper was regularly issued and circulated on each of the dates above named. s/____Carl R. Woodbury_________________________ Subscribed and sworn to before me this 6th day of November, 1950. s/ Neola Gierhart Notary Public in and for Clark County, Nevada. My Commission Expires April 14, 1954. EMERGENCY ORDINANCE NO 436 AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE DECLARING THE DETERMINATION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF LAS VEGAS, NEVADA, TO MAKE CERTAIN PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IN THE CITY OF LAS VEGAS BY INSTALLING A SANITARY SEWER ALONG CERTAIN STREETS, EASEMENTS, ALLEYS AND PORTIONS THEREOF: TO CREATE SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO 200-1 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING SAID IMPROVEMENTS, AND TO DEFRAY THE ENTIRE COSTA AND EXPENSE THEREOF BY SPECIAL ASSESSMENT MADE ACCORDING TO FRONTAGE, FIXING A TIME IN WHICH PROTESTS AGAINST THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS OF THE CREATION OF SUCH DISTRICT MAY BE HEARD AND CONSIDERED BY SAID BOARD, DIRECTING NOTICE THERE- OF TO BE GIVEN AND PROVIDING OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, certain areas in the City of Las Vegas, Nevada, are without adequate sewer improvements, and WHEREAS, certain proceedings were heretofore taken BY the Board of Commissioners of the City of Das Vegas to make the said improvements and to levy an assessment to defray the cost of making the same, and WHEREAS, the bonds for said improvement are not saleable due to the lack of a favorable opinion by hord­ing attorneys, and WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners of the City of Las Vegas has determined that it is for the best interests of the City that the proceedings heretofore taken be abandoned and that the steps for the creation of the assessment district and the construction therein of improvements be started anew, and WHEREAS, the said Board of Commissioners deems it expedient and desirable to create Sanitary fewer Assessment District No. 200-1 for the purpose of installing along certain streets, easements, alleys and portions thereof, hereinafter particularly described, a sanitary sewer composed of vitrified clay pipe, and to defray the entire cost and expense thereof by special assessments made according to frontage against the owners and assessable lots, premises and property specially benefited by such improvements and included within said district, and WHEREAS, there is not included within said district any lands belonging to the City or public rounds not taxable, and in no case does the estimated amount of any special assessment upon any lot or premise for said improvements exceed 50% of the value of such lot or premise as shown up on the latest tax list or assess­ment roll for State and County tax, and WHEREAS, in the judgement of the Board of Commissioners of said City of Las Vegas, it is fair and equit-