upr000283 131

appeal It takes to the supreme court of Nevada, the cause shall, cm the return of the papers to the higher coart, placed on the calendar of the then pending term , bea ndim smheadlila tbeely assigned and brought to a hearing In the same manner as ether caus(ees) on tIhne aclall eancdtairo*ns under this section the burden of proof shall be upon the party attacking or resisting the order of the commission to shoe by clear and satisfactory evidence that the order is unlawful, or unreasonable, as the case may be. ” commissioInn tcoon kneeecpti ao nf wuillt ha nsdec tcoimopnl 6e1t3e3 *r ecsoercdt ioofn a6l1l29 i rtse qupirroecse etdihneg s on any formal investigation, and requires the commission, when afinlye awcittiohn t hies ccloemrmke ncofe dt haeg aicnosutrt iat pcuerrstuiafnite dt coo psyec tofi oanl 6ll 3p3r»o ceteod ings henetlidr aen rde tceosrtdi moof ntyh tea kceonmm uipsosni ons ucish bienfvoerset itghaeti ocno.u rt*Therefore, the X now draw your attention to subsections (b) and (c) of psreectsieonnt e6d1 t33o, three lactoiuvret, tbou bn enwo ebv ipdreensceen teord audpdoint tihoen ahle eavriidnegn bceef ore tghiev ecno ammni sospipoonr.t unIint ys tuoc hc eovnesnidte, rt hseu ccho emvmiidsesnicoen, ias nadu tino mittisc adlilsycr etion to alter, modify, amend or rescind the order which is the basis of tthaen tasmuoiut.n t tIon as or deo-ihnega,r itnhge ocf otmhmei saspipolni cias ttihoenn b eecnaguasgee di ti nm wuhsatt is necessarily reconsider the same in the light of the new or ad di­tional evidence. Company tIo f pientdi ntoitohn ifnogr ian trhee- hestaartiuntge b wefhoirceh wroesuolrdt rienqgu tiroe at hceo urt tahcet iocno uritn woarsd ewri tthoo purte cjluurdies dtihcet iocno mtmois rseivoni efwr tohme cocnotmeminsdsiinogn t'sh ato rder because we had failed to exhaust our administrative remedy. On the contrary, section 6133 would permit an action to be commenced at % cnee, and subsections (b) and (c) of section 6133 would seem to accomplish the same result ordinarily obtained by petitioning fo r a re-hearing before resorting to the court. Sincerely, CALVIN M. CORY