Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000160 199

Image

File
Download upr000160-199.tif (image/tiff; 27.02 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000160-199
Details

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

f Mr. W. 8. Rous* 11, April 2, 1952 a water system fey the District constitutes • pufelie pur­pose when the system is acquired and operated through the power of taxation and the expenditure of public funds,the acquisition and operation of such a system fey means of do­nation should likewise fee considered as feeing for a pufelie purpose within the meaning of Section 23(q)(l). the constitutional limitation upon the power to tax is expressed in 51 A*. Juris* at page iff as follows: •The right to tax depends upon the ultimate use, purpose, and object for which the fund is raised. The first requisite of lawful taxation la that the purpose for which it ia laid is a lawful purpose. The power to tax can be resort­ed to only for a constitutionally valid public purpose. While the power of taxation may fee a-depted as the means to carry into operation an­other power of the legislature, resort to the taxing power for an unconstitutional purpose is not permitted. ®There is implicit in the constitutions of all free governments the limitation that the property of a eitlsen may be taken from him by taxation only to meet definite public needs. It follows that taxes may not fee levied for purely private purposes•” The limitation on the power to appropriate pub­lic funds is stated in 42 Am. Juris., page 756, as followsi "Congress may spend money in aid of the general welfare, and in this respect Its power is as broad as the power to lay taxes for such purposes. A state likewise has power to appro­priate money for any purpose for which taxes may fee levied and collected. Appropriations of public funds must fee for a public purpose.* In applying this doctrine the courts have generally held that money may fee raised fey taxation in furtherance of functions which are for the public benefit, whether such