UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
Digital Provenance
Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
Publisher
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries
Transcription
Los Angeles - September 1, 1953 Mr. L. R. Maag - Las Vegas: (CC - Mr. E. E. Bennett Mr. 0. M. Cory -Las Vegas) You have received copy of Mr. Bennett's letter to me of August 28th, in which he outlines his views on rebates, etc. in connection with Nevada Public Service Commission's order covering rates on refrigeration equipment, .ice making equipment, etc., in Las Vegas: On the assumption that Mr. Bennett is of the opinion that we are required to refund any overcharges made under the previous rate schedules, I go along with the suggestion made in the last paragraph of his letter; namely, "In view of the fact that there are just a few of such accounts, as I understand it, possibly a check should be made of the facilities they now have to see what rates they should pay under the tariff effective May 1, 1953." This should not involve an amount of work which would require the substantial addition*# to your staff referred to in your letter of August fe4th and covered by my reply of August 26, 1953. Wm. Reinhardt
