Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000022 40

Image

File
Download upr000022-040.tif (image/tiff; 26.63 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000022-040
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    UNITED STATES RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION Director General of Railroads. Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad Mutual Packing Co. —- Las Angeles, Jan. 30, 1920 B-12-443 Mr. J. it. Comp took, Assistant Oeneral Manager, Bear Sir® Returning enclosures received with yours of January 29 th, re la tive t© the above: 1 have no record of any agreement with Mr. £oodill to the ef fect fclu? t he would he allowed credit for tii© equipment ins tailed under his direction. 2 und ere tend, however, that he mode application to our operating depart­ment several months before the equipment was installed for the additional machinery, calling attention to the absolute necessity of same on account of the condition of the oranges that season — it being necessary to run them thru a stab­ilizer before shipping;. Long delay in installing the machinery could not be tolerated, therefore hr. Wood ill proceeded to have the work done* ’#« installed the original machinery, and no doubt in time we would -have added what he wanted. The building of the cniianey was evidently necessary and we would have taken care of this work alto in due course of tine It seems to me that the question is, whether or not we could have done or had the work done cheaper, which is doubt ful. Yours very truly, co-J hose Clark