Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000254 244

Image

File
Download upr000254-244.tif (image/tiff; 23.74 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000254-244
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    / C O P Y Los Angeles - May 13* 1953 Mr. L.R. Maag - Las Vegas: cc: Mr. E.E. Bennett I requested Mr. Renwick some time ago to have Mr. Adamson prepare an estimate of the cost of constructing the one large pipe line extending from the east line of the lands, which are included in the proposed sale to the Water District, along the section line to a point approximately on the westerly line of the shop area, and there connecting with the 16" and 24" lines now in place. I think this line is more carefully outlined and described in the proposed agreement with the District. While Mr. Adamson may have these figures all pre­pared, it is my recollection that some time ago you did some figuring on this line and as a matter of check on Mr. Adam­son’s figures I would like you to go over your previous figures if you have some, or if not, prepare new figures on the cost of the line. In preparing these figures, you should remember that: 1. It may be a year or so before the line is actually constructed. 2. That your costs should be based on the use of the most expensive pipe available (probably cast iron), and 3. Allow a generous contingent factor to cover the uncertainties of wage scales, and other factors which might increase the cost. I would say that this contingent item should be not less than 10$ and in the circumstances probably 15$ would be safer. As the essential points in the proposed agreement have now been decided upon and we are hopeful of getting all the doc­uments executed within the shortest possible time, I would appre date your making this job one of first importance. Wm. Reinhardt