Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000203 69

Image

File
Download upr000203-069.tif (image/tiff; 26.72 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000203-069
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    Hon. J.C. Allard, Chairman, Public Service Commission, Carson City, Nevada. Deo. 22, 1950 RE: In the Hatter of titter Service Furnished the Residents of the City of Las Vegas by the Las Vegas Land and Hater Company. (Case Ho. 1207) Dear Hr. Allards You will recall that a hearing m s held in the above matter in Las Vegas on September 20th and 21st and during the course of the hearing it was suggested by Hr. Shamberger that possibly a temporary solution of the shortage of water during peak summer months could be effected by the installation of pumps on some of the wells of the Las Vegas Land and Hater Company. He suggested that possibly such pumps should be put on Hells Nos. 9 and 10 and that, in his opinion, a resulting increase of production would be around three to three and a half million gallons per day (with a draw-down of 25 or 30 ft) and an increased production if the draw-down were lowered. The transcript of record indicates that the Hater Company agreed to Install pumps on certain of Its wells in order to make tests of the increased production and to make a preliminary report to your Commission January 1, 1951 advising you of the results of those teste. With that understanding, the hearing was ad­journed pending the submission of the report and such further action as the Commission or the City of Las Vegas decided to take. Shortly after the adjournment