Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000048 189

Image

File
Download upr000048-189.tif (image/tiff; 23.37 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000048-189
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    Mr. Jefferst l#J 18, 1938 #3 Eeferring to the suggestion in your A-188 that we oaka apollcntion th the Commission for permission to increase rates on all water used for cooling, I Pi ah to advise -that the Comal as ion* a ruling in 1931 covered water used in.refrigerating (ioe) machines only and aid not apply to air cooling machines used in homes, which were unknown %t that time. In vis# of the popularity of theas coolers, It Is very likely thpt a request on our part for permission to increase rates on water need is coolingmachlnss would result in a public hearing by the Commission* !e are very anxious to avoid a public hearing on our' rate®, m this is election year in Hsvada and we oan look for the usual ballyhoo about municipal ownership of electric and water utilities which has been a-political football in this locality for the past -fir# years$ and besides a public hearing would bring tap’ the' question .of our profits on tfea'water .system which have boon- running from 13 to It per cent including tares and depreciation, end would run 33, T par cent excluding' the. #10,710.93 paid the Railroad Company for ^Bent of Pip# Lines* during fe#7v The effect which *Eent for Pipe Lined" ha# on o^r net profit©, is the item which the Public Service Commission dwelt so heavily upon in the last public hearing in 1S3X. • • I believe it woul-i fe# much botter to adopt sug­gestion ?*&* in your telegram,'to "Penalise the use of water for fir t purpose so a© to prevent shortages of water for'essentially necessary purposes*, end-this can be handled more - advantageously by strengthening the- present city ordinance, rather than taking the matter up with the Public Service Commission* Ip now have a city ordinance •which prohibits the useless waste of water, and I assure you we have the full cooperation of the police department in oheokiag up'offenders*. Ho. ever, the;# are one or tec way© in whioh the present o mi nance should be strengthened, as for''instance some people turn their hose on, without-a noa*l#,an4 1st it run on the lawn; this cannot be observed by p cursory examination from the street, and we propose to ?correct this'by .an ordinance that will prohibit the use of water through a hose without a nossie or sprinkling device.