Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000322 22

Image

File
Download upr000322-022.tif (image/tiff; 26.88 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000322-022
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    DIB U E /? ¥ - X X V W. 1. K. DEC 2 7 I960 0®aha - December 21, 1966 LA-10-19 {cc - Mr. G. A. Cunningham - Salt T^Ve Mr. F. G. Sehurman - Salt Lake C. Mr. C. MM.. CGoorryy - LasV egas MMrr.. £I.. cC.. RReennwwiicckk — Los Angeles) cation for drilling a new 16° diameter by 800 feet deep water well at Las Vegas, Nevada under Work Order 40415: We have reviewed these specifications and also compared them with the log and construction of the existing well, which is in the near vicinity of the new proposed well. Basically, our recommendations in regard to changes in the specifications are: 1. Revise to permit construction by rotary or cable tool method of drilling. 2* Delete references to a gravel packed well. The existing well, which has been a good water producer, is not gravel packed* A straight cased well will be more economi­cal to drill and we have been advised that this type of construction is more desirable for the Las Vegas area. 1 . The diameter of the conductor pipe be re­duced to 20 inches and the length increased to 100 feet. This diameter is sufficient for the 16 inch casing and the additional length will give more protection from sur­face contamination. Attached hereto is one copy of your specifications on which the above revisions and other minor corrections have been noted. R. M. BROUN