upr000149 246

Thin is sobs valid ground for this contention, St least to ths extent of expectancy of s notification of their rates. Ths auto courts sro generally termed “notela-, and operate much ths sans as hotels. A comparison of maxi­mum rotes charged for 15-oabln auto court, sash cabin with toilet and hath* and s 15-room hotel* sash rose with toilet and hath* follows: Ants court of 1$ cabins i ti.50 I 22.50 Hotel of 15 rooms: Initial charge, 10 rooms' 5 additional roona t 1)1 15 toilets • 15# 19 hatha • 150 I 1.90 2..2755 1 7.75 rates, it wIofu ltdhe haa ntssx pcooeluerdt otwhen erCso mpmeitsisitoino nw aea lrded huocltdi onn in hearing and invite testimony. In view of ear net tamin gs •war a period of years, Mr. Bennett la particularly anxious to avoid agitation that night land to a review of the entire schedule with possibility of a general reduction. Beth sate court and hotel operators catering to transient trade advise they are beginning to feel the effect of the rubber situation. (b) Answered above. (a) Ths only reaeon 1 sen assign to omitting hotels from the vacancy allowance list la developed from the above comparison of respective schedule rates. (d) I t we art to depart from a pareeatage allowance far ante courts, X think wn should require a monthly state­ment from each facility shoving actual vaeaney daring the month and adjust each bill accordingly. X have not suffi­cient faith in human nature to fool that, without cheeking, statements as to vacancies would, in nil eases, ha accur­ately rendered. Xt would soon advisable, therefore, to make an occasional shook, and X presume the registry beaks of the facilities would ho open to us for that purpose. Xt aeons wo eeuld reasonably taka the position that when such records ere not predated, the 1005 charge would ho mode. If it is decided to make sash a check, X think it in essential that, because pf his personal naguaIntames