Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000350 151

Image

File
Download upr000350-151.tif (image/tiff; 26.38 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000350-151
Details

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

Los Angeles - January 33* 1956 80-11 Mr. V. W. Smith: cc: Mr. Wm. Reinhard Mr. C. M. Bates Referring to my letter of January 13th to Mr. Johnson, copy to you, relative to the desirability of having an inspection made on the ground of the obliga tions of the Las Vegas Valley Water District to remove and/or relocat^^WTTffi^Tp'8'"~rirret^^d’WTr es formerly located on our property, pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 of Contract C.L.D. 113^2: to Las Vegas, to discuss the matter with Mr, Renshaw, Engineer and General Manager of the Water District, and I enclose copy of letter from Mr. Renshaw to Mr. Hammill, together with copy of tabulation showing the status of these projects referred to in Section 5 of the above-mentioned agreement. time selling some of our property out there, I think it is highly desirable that we know that the facilities to be removed have been removed, and the facilities to be relocated or newly constructed have been completed, in order that we may make the necessary reservations or eliminate reservations in our deeds. Would it be pos­sible for you to have someone from the Division Engineer's office, presumably Mr. Maag who is familiar with these transactions, go out to Vegas and make an on-the-ground inspection of all this work, and see that it has been done in compliance with provisions of the contract in question so we may be advised of the completion of all the work required under Section 5, and also so that we may close the escrow and release the Relocation Fund which is held therein to the Water District. port similar to that attached to Mr. Renshaw*s letter showing the status of all this work. Recently I asked Mr. Hammill, who was going In view of the fact that we are from time to If this can be done, I would appreciate a re- / r E. E. Bennett j