upr000209 166

Los Angeles, November 16, 1942 Mr, C‘. A. Xeeble: Replying to yours of October 23rd, in connection with Invoice covering 200 sacks of Aquagel applying on Order SB-1820} above £00 sacks Aquagel, together with Requisition 64-113, covering 400 sacks of Drlleo, were prepared in this office upon receiving telephone advice from Mr. Scott on April 23rd that he had received the above mentioned merchandise but had received no purchase order nor requisition to cover. We, of course, have no record as to the actual receipt of the Aquagel at Las Vegas. ing Well No. 10 discloses that while 265 sacks of Aquagel were shown as being delivered to this well only 56 sacks were accounted for in the drilling operations. It would appear, therefore, that the 200 sacks in question were not received nor used, thus confirming Harold's statement that they did not make shipment. went forward in two shipments, 200 sacks in Car UP 75334, and 200 sacks in Car UP 307592, both cars arriving Las Vegas, April 9th, together with Car UP 13326 containing 400 sacks of Drlleo. sacks of Aquagel, and 64-113, covering 400 sacks of Drlleo, were- prepared upon-Mr. Scott's advice that he had not received requisition nor purchase order for these materials, but in view of the fact that the 200 sacks of Aquagel on Requisition 64-114 (SD-1820) were evidently not used nor received, it would appear that Mr. Scott's statement with respect to the receipt of Aquagel had reference to one of the two shipments arriving in Cars UP 76334 and UP 307592, which were already covered by Requisition 64-105 (SB-1892), thus resulting in the preparation of a dupli­cate Requisition 64-114 (SD-1820). Requisition 64-114, dated April 23rd, covering the review of the record of materials used in drill- The 400 sacks of Aquagel purchased on Order SD-1692 As stated above, Requisitions 64-114, covering 200 Frank Strong ec— Mr. Mr. S. B. Hall Mr. W. B. Scott - Las Vegas 3s