Image
Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
( copy ) orig*-36~1*7'*Nev • flaaom-iAiK 36*»47Wl#nereX x mmmP* X/flO-11- LAS VALLEY WAT8R H U. SAM! 9 July 8, 1953 Mr. E, 1. Bennett (ee * Mr. C. M. Bates) With reference to the letter of July 7# 1953* from Mr. Bates# concerning NLD 2035* being an Extension Rider of Audit No. 58126, NIB 1031# covering the furnishing of water to Leonard R* Fayle, dba Quality Bakery, and requesting a termination of this agreement and the preparation of a new agreement with lessees of Payle, I am wondering about the terms of the proposed new agreement in view of Section 2 of the agreement between the Water Company and the Las Vegas Valley Water District« Section 2 of the aforesaid agreement provides, In part, as followst ’’With respect to any water produced after the sale date from wells now or hereafter located in said shop grounds, the First Parties, and each of them, agree that none of said water so produced shall be used except by First Parties, or any of them, or corporations affiliated in ownership with First Parties or any of them.* It is my understanding that the Railroad Company will be unable to furnish any so-called surplus water after said sale date. The proposed new agreement provides for a term of five years. Although our usual form of agreement permits termination upon thirty days written notice, it seems to me that any new water contract should provide for a termination to be effective upon the so-called sale date. NLD 1031, Audit No. 58126, provides that it shall be automatically terminated without notice upon the termination of the tenancy of the User* The tenancy of the User was terminated on May 24, 1950 when Deed Audit 1911, conveying the property to the User, was executed* Consequently, it would appear that we have been furnishing water under a contract whieh terminated three years ago and I am wondering if you do not think we should continue this practice without a new contract in view of the limitations imposed by the agreement with the Water District. I will appreciate your advising me how the proposed contract, as well as future water contracts, should be handled. (Sgd) CALVIN M. CORY