Image
Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
TABLE OF CASES Vtl PAGE Prendergast v. New York Tel. Co., '262 U. S. 43............................... 10 Queens Borough G. & E. Co. v. Prendergast, 31 Fed. (2d) 339, at 364 ______________________________________________ :____ 139 Railroad Commission v. Duluth St. R. Co., 273 U. S. 625................ 10 Smyth v. Ames, 169 U. S. 466..............................................................25, 26 Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Railroad Commission, 5 Fed. (2d) 77, 95 ................................................i __________________ _____ 85, 139 Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission, 262 U. S. 276............|.......................... I___1____ ___ _________________ 180 Southern 'Pacific Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 219 U . S. 433.............................J ...................................... .................... 14 St. Louis & O’Fallon Ry. Co. v. United States, 279 U. S. 461....11, 14 Springfield Gas & Elec. Co. v. Public Serv. Comm., 10 Fed. (2d) 252, 255 ...................................... ./............................................................ 139 United Fuel Gas Co. v. Railroad Commission, 13 Fed. (2d), 510, 521 .................................................................................................. ........... 86 United Fuel Gas Co. v. Railroad Commission, 278 U. S. 300..........181 United Railways and Electric Company of Baltimore v. West, 280 U. S. 234, 249 ; 74 L. ed. 390, 408........|................136, 137, 168, 178 Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Denver Tramway Co., 3 Fed. (2d) 285.......................................................................... . 57 City of Winona v. Wisconsin, Etc., 276 Fed. 996.............................. 86 Wisconsin-Minnesota L. & P. Co. v. Railroad Commission, 197 N. W. 363..... i .................. ......I.................................................. ............ 163