Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000280 158

Image

File
Download upr000280-158.tif (image/tiff; 26.87 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000280-158
Details

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

Las Vegas - March 5* 1952 W M . R-Mr. R, M. Sutton » Omaha MftR 7 oc: Mr. Wm. Relnh&rdt-Los Angeles*^ Mr. E. E. Bennett-Los Angeles Mr. ¥* H. Hulsizer- Omaha Referring to your airmail letter of February 29, File 704-35 concerning data furnished Mr. Bennett: I am attaching revised pages 7 and 8 based upon the figures set forth in your letter with the exception of "Extraordinary Expenses". In addition to the retirement charges of #6 4ff-,f4 under WQ’s 669 and 678, we incurred an estimated expense of #851 in rearranging service connections incident to the replacement of water mains under ¥0 678, which was charged direct to maintenance of distribution mains. As this was an out-of-face rearrangement and not ordinary maintenance, we have deducted such expense in the revised statement In order to arrive at a comparison of oost of ordinary maintenance. the years 1950 and 1951? amounting to $29 028 and ,|42 878 respectively, in preparing the original statement on page 7, we used the expenses as reported on Form 7 - Statement of Operating Revenues and Expenses for these years. In prep&rlni the attached revised statement, we have^ as previously stated, As regards the supervisory and office expenses for used the amounts of |30 ?19 and |44 422 respectively. Ihe revised comparison appearing on attached page 8 shows an increase in cost of operation per consumer from 17.81 In 1950 to $8.72 in 1951'and an estimated cost of #8.73 in 1952.