upr000063 68

V MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PETITION 1. THE OPINION AND ORDER OF THE COMMISSION UNLESS CORRECTED BY IT WILL BE SET ASIDE BY THE COURTS BECAUSE THEY ARE BASED, IN MATERIAL RESPECTS, ON MATTERS NOT IN THE RECORD. In deciding this case the Commission has denied the Water Company one of the most fundamental rights to which a utility is entitled — that is, the right to have a decision affecting its rates be based upon the evidence of record, only on the evidence of record and not upon sources of information outside of the record in the case. In its opinion in this case the Commission recites facts which are apparently taken from the transcript in the former case before the Commission in 1931 in- * volving the rates of the Water Company (I & S Docket No. 52), it refers to Annual Reports of the Water Company which were not in- ... * troduced in evidence and it relies upon numerous facts, the source of which cannot be determined. All of this is matter which the Water Company had no opportunity to explain or refute. As a re­sult the Commission has arrived at a number of erroneous find­ings of fact hereafter more particularly discussed which ma­terially affect its final conclusions with respect to the level of rates which it finds the Water Company is entitled to charge k in the future. There is no doubt that the Commission’s opinion and $ order violate the well recognized rules of law which govern the processes by which it can regulate the rates of a public utility and that the order will be set aside by a Court unless corrected by this Commission by' the rendering of a decision based solely - 1 8 -