Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
Member of
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
On aha August 11, 1950* Mr* ' fli g 0/,\ 3703.1 O' . ? ? x Wfi CC - Mr. A. E. Stoddard, Mr. V.rm. Reinhardt - Los Angeles Mr. T. h. Bo ekes Referring to 3rour letter of June 26, 1950, file 30-5, enclosing rough draft of report prepared by Mr. Welie on results of operation of the water system at Las Vegas, and draft of pro posed new agreement between the Railroad Company and the hater Company: With respect to Mr* hehe’s report, I am attaching a memorandum listing my views and suggestions. While your attention is called to several apparent errors as noted, we have not made a mechanical check of all the computations. The main points-at issue as I see it are (l) - the question of reducing rental base by the estimated depreciation accrued thereon in computing interest charged the hater Company for use of Railroad Company1s facilities as outlined in my comments on attached memo regarding page 27 of the report, item 6(c), and (2) - reduction in rate base by the estimated unrefundable portion of construction advances subject to complete a partial refund, as referred to on the attached memo in my comments regarding page 36 of the report. While I believe that, for our information, we should have the results of operations as set out in Mr. ¥ehe* s report, including the adjustments noted in (1) and (2) above, tne report, in my opinion, should not be presented to the Utilities Commission on that basis. With respect to the proposed new agreement between Railroad and Water Company: Section k (c). An item of “vacation allowance" should be added.