ent001500-030

,fa?║e A KEIlH Ymi ?╜?╜?╟≤?? based on What! the budget' the itsoiwi ;C#i|*!isfi I'lgi $56,000;#m# issil;*e lift:?½ m ihsuld have mtlv?╜d had w# received AAiil w?╜i anticipated fifAf receive* HiiiC K0VEU.I ' YouVe KEITH ASfrftvCKTHt received that figure a?½ of when? if I 31st. HWBC AiVBAiIt Ariel you an short $21,600 odd? (f^ K1ITI1 AillAliTiii Yes, IftlifC KDVEtLi ><dlf now why**?╜?? whet Is the .difference between that aaa ||?╜ $16*000 that you show rtcaivablt aii the first lilnw ASHKRfHi About $4*690* |B| A C HMBC HMfSIMi 1 mean why Is the difference? ' 1|?½I XElth BAAifAisTii* AtfilA A?╜s?? a?½ tho difference In th?½ bonk notes*- Is* li?? etoio mousyi it?╟╓s a difference in ?╜?? anticipated revenue ?╟  wnst w*v?½ actually received* You sn, If Z ii|?╜f In my previous statementsv -we thought there was -** talk and we had reason to believe wt the majority contributors to the Uvewire which destitutes ?½ts t>r4 ??s.tl'ri#'s t.ivj = s? you*!! all recall there'Is a formula In use* based' on rooms endl^^fe ?╜*?╟≤* aid slot machines, etc, that we?╟╓re' still going under the formulas tleh were developed approximately three years ago, something like thfet, and since that time there has been covers1 additions of room?½ and games and slot machines that the various major contributors whose ??*??bers constitute membership An this'Committee and we thought that was going to be re-evaulated but It hasn?╟╓t been done, so con* I^equently our income Is much lower than anticipated. But you could see if It were there, with the expenditures our expenditures are also down $19,939 call It $20*000 ?╟≤* they are down $19,000, so actually we are keeping within our budget because we?╟╓re net 'spending what , mm we?╟╓re going to spend because we?╟╓re not getting whet wi said we?╟╓re going to get* , -?√ß ;; itANK iaaalLi Hell, Where is this going to.leave us **<* if you ;pr?? jeet Ip this figure? |A . ?√ß ., a*?√ß&*?√ß??? ;::||n?╜|s:rs ' - ?√ß f .. K?·lTM ASil?½C^H*E.A;Xf we project this figure the way it?╟╓s going right flour* gentlemen, without any additional* income or patching funds as we ill I anticipate we would have available this committee 8S \ this 'year Is going to wind up witE'about $0*000 towards the $100*000 that they?╟╓re trying to raise. So we?╟╓re under pur expenditures we?╟╓re getting-even -???╟≤ we?╟╓re even now ??** we?╟╓re starting to gain a little bit, but wo?╟╓re gaining very very slowly and you?╟╓re talking about a lot of money for promotion* ;-e*ra not getting it out of our source of income ?╟≤*>?√ß*** we?╟╓ve got to find a source of income or increase ip*! iM^prce ei/ii*cope* S ?√ß; . ,vi, ' A:|r g?╟ ji-W'f%?√ß |??;i is there a possibility- of keeping this formula going from year to year to re*tvaulate it each year? -,' V , ?√ß S|S ' , KEITH lS:8lA;ATiii *?╟≤11# ltfs, I?╟╓ll let the manager answer that as-