Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

man000177 214

Image

File
Download man000177-214.tif (image/tiff; 26.72 MB)

Information

Digital ID

man000177-214
Details

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

A u g .28,1950 Procedu^ to be followed with the A^rentory data pres^ted by Wm. Reinhardt on LaWVegas Land and Water Company valuation study. 1. Data presented: The first group of data received, August 26, shows only the pipe south of Charleston Boulevard, the size, length, type (cast iron or other) and age. Left blank are columns on prices and depreciation. The form of data sheet presented infers that we will use the method of valuation known as ’’Reproduction-eost- new-less-depreciation”. The Courts uphold such a method on condemnations. (’’Historical cost”, in which the book costs are examined and passed if fairly reasonable, is the other method of valuation.) NOTE: The LVL&W CO has always hired the Nevada Construction Company to do all their construction work- so all overhead, as contractor’s profit, engineering, etc., could be considered included in their book costs. (This I was told by the men laying pipe). (A) Work to be done first; Scale the distances on the maps submitted and check the lengths of pipe listed in the totals. We must accept, with a general check, the age of the pipe as given. The last ten annual reports will help to check the data on age. The result of this work is merely to check the inventory. (B) The next step is to apply values, useful life periods, etc. 1. We can send all the data to Greeley and Hansen and pay $5000 for their valuation fee. G&H will have to use’’Reproduct ion-cost-new-less -depreciation”, as they have no historical costs to follow unless they do their work in LA or LV. The Korean war moves pipe prices up every month now- some month will have to be taken as basic. 2. The Manager can solicit car-load prices for pipe, by mail contacts in LA, and use his analysis records for labor etc.,(records have to be adjusted to 1950) and compile a valuation here in LV. If his total is shown Reinhardt, Reinhardt has two moves: to accept, if larger, or to attack if smaller. If R. shows his valuation to the Manager, it can be dis­sected, checked and arbitrated. (Will he do this?) 5. Depend upon the annual reports of the utility to the Nevada Public Service Commission, which for 1948: L&W Co. fixed capital $501,956.16 RR production property Land $ 54,985.88 Imps 751.820.50 766.806.18 $ 1,568,762.54 Additions in 1949 and 1950, est. 151,257.66 $ 1,500,000 How far this could be pushed as present value is questionable. . A trip by the Manager to see Reinhardt in LA seems wise HFC 4