upr000090 93

V Company by deed Audit No. 4694, dated June 14, 1944, quitclaimed to the City of Las Vegas an easement for highway purposes only, and under Conditions and Reservations, Item 3 retained an easement for the 16-inch and 24- inch pipe line across the highway. Under Item 5, R. R. Co. retained easement for right to construct additional facilities such as power lines, water lines, railroad tracks, etc. across the highway, therefore, it appears there may be a question as to whether the City could grant them an easement across the high­way, and this agreement should include the pipe line crossing over Highway 95. This is a technical or legal question which you may desire to consider. Also under (c), page 6 , lines 11 and 12, after the words ”said pipe lines”, insert ”and power lines”. Page 6 , Section 10. In other portions of this agreement, District has requested easement for existing water and power lines and certain additional power and water lines, and it seems to me that the District in Section 10 is ask­ing for blanket authority for easement in the future along any and all section lines (and perhaps they mean half section, quarter section, ete.) on our property which will remain after the sale of the 507 aeres to them. It may be that some time in the future, when the District desires an easement along some section line, half section line or quarter section line, we may have already converted this area into an industrial or possibly a housing district. This appears to me to be too broad a request for future easements. This agreement appears to protect probable relocations of pipe and power lines. ;ached is your copy of Exhibit ”B” and your copy of Drawing 1-128, no date, transmitted with your R. L. Adamson